Skip to main content
Skip to main content
Polkadot logo

System Parachains: An Introduction to Governance-Allocated Parachain Slots

The Polkadot network has a number of teams developing parachains, each optimized for its own domain. These parachains specialize in smart contracts, identity, DeFi, robotics, bridges, and more.

By Joe PetrowskiFebruary 25, 2021

The Polkadot network has a number of teams developing parachains, each optimized for its own domain. These parachains specialize in smart contracts, identity, DeFi, robotics, bridges, and more. Polkadot was designed such that chains could optimize their business logic to specific use cases and interact with each other in a secure and meaningful way.

Despite the infinite design space of blockchain systems, the Relay Chain can support a limited number of parachains and needs to select which chains should have access to its computing capacity. In most cases, it uses an on-chain auction where parachain teams (or perhaps even chains themselves) bid by expressing their willingness to lock up (bond) DOT tokens for the duration of the parachain slot’s lease. But Polkadot’s on-chain governance system can also allocate parachain slots in cases where it would benefit the network as a whole, without requiring a bond, in perpetuity.

Parachain auctions serve as a discovery mechanism for the most in-demand primitives, products, and projects. At the end of a parachain slot auction, the network reserves the winners’ DOT for the duration of their slot lease, resulting in an opportunity cost: the users who provided that DOT could use it for something else, e.g. staking. Parachain teams know how much they value the slot, but cannot know how much other teams value the same slot. The network’s on-chain auction aims to reveal each chain’s true valuation of the slot and award it to the highest bidders.

The Free Rider Problem

Polkadot’s auction mechanism doesn’t work effectively for all parachains, for example those that could be considered as common goods. The concept of ”common goods” has been discussed by political and economic philosophers for centuries, and how a society allocates them raises a standard set of problems.

One of these problems is known as the free-rider problem. Take a bridge to another network as an example: every parachain team may believe that having this bridge would benefit their parachain and its users. If an individual team contributes to the bridge’s auction campaign, then they are giving up resources that they could use in their own auction. If they do not contribute, and enough others do, then they can still use the bridge. These free riders would benefit from the parachain on the backs of those who did support its slot lease. Because of the incentive to free ride, parachains that have almost universal buy-in may end up without enough DOT backing their auction bid.

Polkadot’s governance process can provision these slots to avoid the free-rider problem. With a public referendum, network stakeholders can decide to register a parachain outside of the auction process. As the Council and Technical Committee exist to represent passive stakeholders and provide technical guidance, both groups are expected to engage in discussions and on-chain motions to accept or reject the direct registration of certain parachains.

As with all decisions that go through public referenda, the network’s stakeholders have the final say in what passes and what does not. Understanding this, we may initially see two categories of blockchains that qualify as system parachains (ones that perform a common good) in the Polkadot network: system-level chains and public utility chains.

System-Level Chains

System-level chains move functionality from the Relay Chain into parachains, minimizing the administrative use of the Relay Chain. For example, a governance parachain could move all the Polkadot governance processes from the Relay Chain into a parachain. Adding a system-level chain is generally uncontroversial, because they merely move functionality that the stakeholders already agreed was useful from one place (the Relay Chain) to another (a parachain).

Moving the logic from the Relay Chain to a parachain is an optimization that makes the entire network more efficient. All validators need to process all Relay Chain transactions, but split into small groups to validate parachains in parallel. By moving system-level logic to a parachain, and allowing the processing to be done by a subgroup of validators instead of all, it frees capacity in the Relay Chain for its primary function: validating parachains. Adding a system-level chain could make the network capable of processing several more parachains. Rather than taking a slice of a 100 parachain pie, a system-level chain takes one slice and bakes a bigger pie.

Examples of potential system-level chains include parachains for balances, elections (for both staking and Council), governance, and identity. Eventually, the Relay Chain could become transactionless, as in, it would only validate parachain state transitions and all of its current transactional functionality would exist within parachains.

Public Utility Chains

Public utility chains add functionality that doesn’t exist yet, but that the stakeholders believe will add value to the entire network. Because public utility chains add new functionality, there is a subjective component to their addition: the stakeholders of the network must believe that it is worth allocating a slot that would otherwise go to the winners of an auction, and thus would have an objective expression of conviction from its backers. Governance provides the means to internalize the value of the parachain slot and distribute it across all members of the network.

Public utility chains will always be fully aligned with their Relay Chain stakeholder base. This means that they will adopt the Relay Chain's native token (i.e. DOT or KSM) as their native token and respect any messages incoming from the Relay Chain and system-level parachains at face value.

Some examples of potential public utility chains are bridges, generic asset chains, and DOT-denominated smart contract platforms. All of these could operate without a new token:

  • A bridge could add its own native token to charge as a toll, but in many cases that would be arbitrary value capture, when it could just as well use DOT and/or the bridged chain’s assets in its fee mechanism.
  • A DOT-denominated smart contract layer-one blockchain would allow Wasm smart contract execution using DOT as the native asset with which to pay gas.
  • A generic assets chain would allow anyone to place a deposit in DOT to deploy their asset on-chain. Assets on this chain could be backed by physical goods like artwork, real estate, or gold; or by paper goods like shares in a company or fiat currency held by a trusted party, providing a stable, permanent launchpad for stablecoins and Central Bank Digital Currencies.

Public utility parachains would typically grant privileged business logic to Polkadot’s governance. Just like the Polkadot Relay Chain has several privileged functions like setting the validator count or allocating DOT from the Treasury, these parachains can have privileged functions like changing system parameters or registering an asset.

Because public utility chains add functionality beyond the scope of the Relay Chain, we expect the network stakeholders to approve them only in rare scenarios. The vast majority of system parachains will likely be the unopinionated system-level chains.

Summary: Polkadot's System Parachains

The concept of a system parachain that performs a common good is essential to launching Polkadot and Kusama. By allocating a subset of parachain slots to system parachains, the entire network can realize the benefit of valuable parachains that would otherwise be underfunded due to the free-rider problem. Polkadot’s governance system is on the bleeding edge of social coordination and it will be exciting to see how it helps the network evolve to meet the needs of its constituent parachains and stakeholders.

From the blog

Security isn’t optional: What builders are factoring into chain choice

Security is no longer an afterthought in blockchain development. Builders are looking beyond incentives to long-term infrastructure stability. Here's why resiliency is critical and how the Polkadot Assurance Legion is helping developers launch safely.

How to set up a Polkadot wallet: A step-by-step guide

New to Polkadot? This beginner-friendly guide walks you through how to set up a Polkadot-compatible wallet, from choosing the right option to securing your seed phrase and getting started with staking and managing your DOT.

What is a DAO? How decentralized communities are reshaping governance

DAOs are changing how communities organize online. Learn what a DAO is, how decentralized governance works, the different types of DAOs, and how you can participate in blockchain-powered decision-making.

Governance, side by side: Polkadot, Ethereum, and NEAR

Decentralized Mic pulled together experts from leading experts from Polkadot, Ethereum, and NEAR to discuss decentralized decision-making approaches, address participation challenges, and explore the potential impact of AI on future governance models.

Where real-world value meets access: How Polkadot powers RWA and DePIN

Polkadot is making real-world assets and infrastructure accessible through tokenization, unlocking new opportunities in finance and energy for everyday participants and communities.

Understanding DeFi: A starter guide to decentralized finance

DeFi transforms traditional finance by replacing banks and brokers with smart contracts on blockchain networks. Discover how dapps enable lending, trading, and earning interest without intermediaries—and how Polkadot’s interoperability brings these tools together for a connected financial future.

The evolution of digital ownership: How tokenization is transforming gaming, music, and beyond

Tokenization is redefining digital ownership in gaming and music, enabling players and artists to control their assets. With blockchain, NFTs, and Polkadot’s interoperability, digital economies are becoming more decentralized, secure, and accessible.

Web3 funding playbook for builders, creators, and founders

Discover funding opportunities in the Polkadot ecosystem, from grants and bounties to venture capital and community-driven fundraising. Explore pathways for builders at every stage, with insights on securing support for DeFi, DePIN, AI, gaming, and real-world asset tokenization.

From speculation to sustainability: Top ETHDenver takeaways

ETHDenver 2025 highlighted Web3’s shift toward sustainability, emphasizing talent development, decentralized governance, and aligned incentives. Polkadot’s insights reinforced the industry’s move beyond speculation toward long-term, community-driven growth.

Build, Play, Connect: Join Polkadot at ETHDenver 2025

Get ready for ETHDenver 2025 with Polkadot! Join Polkadot for keynotes, hacker houses & parties, immersive booth experiences, and hands-on workshops. Whether you’re building, playing, or connecting, there’s something for everyone at one of blockchain’s biggest events.

The most impactful blockchain use cases in 2025 and why Polkadot is leading the way

Explore the top blockchain trends of 2025, from decentralized AI and tokenized assets to enterprise adoption and Web3 gaming. Learn how projects powered by Polkadot are shaping the future of finance, infrastructure, and digital identity.

Decentralization’s ripple effect: How Web3 is rewriting digital sovereignty

Centralized platforms dictate access, control data, and pose security risks, leaving individuals without control over their digital presence. Decentralization offers a resilient alternative, paving the way to a digitally sovereign future.